Image Wisely, a joint initiative of ACR, RSNA, ASRT and AAPM,
provides information to the medical community to promote safety in medical imaging.

Image Wisely Logo
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Pledge  

    PLEDGE

    1. Imaging Professionals
    2. Referring Practitioners
    3. Imaging Facilities
    4. Associations & Educational Programs

    HONOR ROLL

    1. Facilities
    2. Associations & Educational Programs
    3. International Facilities
  • Imaging Modalities  

    GENERAL RADIATION SAFETY

    1. Radiation Safety Resources
    2. Resources for Patients and Referring Practitioners

    IMAGING MODALITIES

    1. Computed Tomography
    2. Magnetic Resonance
    3. Nuclear Medicine
    4. Fluoroscopy
    5. Attestation Information
  • News
  • Educational Tools  

    EDUCATIONAL TOOLS

    1. Safety Cases
    2. RSNA Exhibits
    3. What We're Reading
    4. Image Wisely Video On-Demand
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  1. Home
  2. Nuclear Medicine
  3. Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Loading component...

Loading component...

Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

E. Gordon DePuey, MD, St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY
Download PDF

Standard Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Protocols and Associated Patient Radiation Doses

Myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a well-established, highly standardized test to detect significant coronary artery disease and to risk-stratify patients with regard to cardiac event-free survival. Recently there have been significant advancements in scintillation camera hardware and software that allow for decreased image acquisition times and considerably lower injected radiopharmaceutical activity, resulting in lower patient radiation doses. Moreover, there has been a recent emphasis on patient-centered imaging, whereby SPECT imaging protocols are tailored to specific patient needs and diagnostic expectations. These patient-centered protocols have been designed to preserve or improve image quality and, when possible, also decrease patient radiation dose.

 Study Injected Activity  Effective Dose Estimate 
1-day rest/stress 99mTc based 10 mCi rest
30 mCi stress
9.3 mSv 99mTc tetrofosmin
11.4 mSv 99mTc sestamibi
1-day stress/rest 99mTc based 10 mCi stress
30 mCi rest
9.3 mSv 99mTc tetrofosmin
11.4 mSv 99mTc sestamibi
2-day stress/rest or rest/stress 99mTc based 25 mCi stress
25 mCi rest
11.6 mSv 99mTc tetrofosmin
14.8 mSv 99mTc sestamibi
Stress-only 99mTc based  25 mCi stress 5.8 mSv 99mTc tetrofosmin
6.8 mSv 99mTc sestamibi
1-day 201Tl rest/99mTc based stress 3.5 mCi 201Tl
25 mCi 99mTc m
21.2 mSv 201Tl /99mTc tetrofosmin
22.1mSv 201Tl /99mTc sestamibi
1-day stress/redistribution 201Tl 3.5 mCi 201Tl stress 15.3 mSv
1-day stress/reinjection/redistribution 201Tl 3.0 mCi 201Tl stress
1.0 mCi 201Tl reinjection
19.7 mSv
Attenuation correction
   153Gd
   X-ray CT
< 0.3 mSv
< 1 mSv
                                                   

Recommendations to Decrease/Limit Patient Radiation Exposure

 

  • Follow the recommendation of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology to decrease patient radiation exposure to <9 mSv in 50% of patients by 20141.
  • Follow appropriate use guidelines in selecting patients for myocardial perfusion SPECT.2,3
    • Do not perform cardiac imaging in patients without cardiac symptoms unless high-risk markers for coronary events are present.
    • Do not perform cardiac imaging for patients who are at low risk of coronary events.
    • Do not perform radionuclide cardiac imaging as part of routine follow-up of asymptomatic patients.
    • Do not perform cardiac imaging as a pre-operative assessment in patients scheduled to undergo low or intermediate risk non-cardiac surgery.
  • Avoid stress/delayed and stress/reinjection/delayed Tl-201 protocols and rest Tl-201/stress Tc-99m based protocols, all of which increase patient radiation exposure considerably4.
  • Implement stress-only SPECT protocols in patients with no prior myocardial infarction and a low/moderate likelihood of coronary artery disease. Radiation dose can be significantly decreased in those patients in whom stress SPECT is entirely normal and a subsequent resting scan is deemed unnecessary4.
  • Implement new software methods, incorporating iterative reconstruction, resolution recovery, and noise modulation, that cope with lower cardiac SPECT counting statistics and thereby provide excellent image quality despite reduced time SPECT acquisitions and/or reduced injected radiopharmaceutical activities4,5.
  • Implement new hardware methods, including cardio-focused collimation and solid state detectors that provide excellent image quality despite reduced time SPECT acquisitions and/or reduced injected radiopharmaceutical activities4,5.
  • Instead of “weight-base” dosing, in which injected radiopharmaceutical activity is increased in larger patients, prolong SPECT acquisition times (as tolerated by the patient) to achieve equivalent myocardial count density scans4,5.

 

References

  1. Cerquiera MD et al, Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol, May 2010. https://www.asnc.org/files/Rec%20for%20Reducing%20Radiation%20Expo%20in%20MPI.pdf
  2. Hendel RC et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009;53:2201-29. http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1139755
  3. Hendel RC et al. Choosing Wisely, ABIM. http://choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/5things_12_factsheet_Amer_Soc_Nuc_Cardio.pdf
  4. DePuey EG et al. Patient-Centered Imaging: ASNC Preferred Practice Statement. J Nucl Cardiol, March 2012, in press. https://www.asnc.org/files/PCI%202012.pdf
  5. DePuey EG. Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware: currently available and on the horizon. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, in press. (abstract not yet available – PMID in process)

ACR_WHITE
rsna-logo-bw
asrt-logo-bw
aapm-logo-bw
  • Connect

Copyright © 2010-26 American College of Radiology
Terms and Conditions | Privacy